Degree in Philosophy, Politics and Economics

Bachelor in Philosophy, Politics and Economics

Get ready to face current challenges with a unique program taught by three prestigious universities

Analysis of the Social Reality

Description
The contents of this course will enable the student to understand and conduct a social research process and evaluate those carried out in their field of study. Additionally, they will acquire the necessary knowledge to tackle the methodological section of their final thesis (TFG).
Type Subject
Tercer - Obligatoria
Semester
Second
Course
3
Credits
6.00
Previous Knowledge
Objectives

The course will provide the tools, skills, and competencies that students need to conduct a diagnosis and assessment based on data they generate themselves or data generated by others. In this regard, they must understand the main methods and techniques of social research, both qualitative and quantitative, which will enable them to effectively carry out the objectives they formulate or need to accomplish. Furthermore, this course will also equip them with the necessary tools to complete their Final Degree Project (TFG).

Contents

Topic 1: Social Research Techniques: Qualitative vs. Quantitative
1.1. Advantages and differences
1.2. Mixed research models
1.3. Rigor and quality in social research
1.4. Ethical requirements in research
1.5. The research project
Topic 2: Data Sources
2.1. Types of data sources
2.2. Obtaining secondary data
Topic 3: The Survey
3.1. Characteristics and types
3.2. Sample and sampling
3.3. Types of questionnaires
3.4. Constructing the questionnaire
3.5. Pre-test and application
3.6. Sampling
Topic 4: Interpretation of Statistical Data
4.1. Descriptive analysis
4.2. Bivariate analysis
Topic 5: Observation
5.1. Characteristics and types
5.2. Participant observation and ethnography
5.3. Researcher roles
5.4. Contexts of observation: entry, interaction, and exit from the field
5.5. Data recording, field diary
Topic 6: The Interview and Its Types
6.1. Characteristics and types of individual interviews
6.2. Selection of interviewees. Criteria for selection and types of sampling
6.3. Interview guide
6.4. Obstacles and facilitators of the interview
6.5. Aspects of the interviewer
Topic 7: Life Stories and Narratives
7.1. Characteristics and typology
7.2. Structure and development of stories and life histories
Topic 8: Focus Group Interviews
8.1. Types of focus group interviews
8.2. The moderator
8.3. The participants
8.4. Group organization. Selection criteria
Topic 9: Delphi Method
9.1. Characteristics of the method
9.2. Constructing the questionnaire and application phases
Topic 10: Discourse Analysis
10.1. Characteristics of qualitative analysis and its types
10.2. Analytical procedures: categorization systems, coding, and interpretation
Topic 11: Reporting Research Results
11.1. Types of reports
11.2. Structure and writing process

Methodology
Evaluation

To pass the course, it is necessary to pass the exam, regardless of the final grade obtained from the sum of all assessable activities. If the sum of the assessable activities is higher than 5 but the student has not passed the exam, it will be recorded on the grade report as ?Not Submitted.?

Assessable activities must be submitted/presented on the dates indicated by the instructor. If, for any duly justified reason communicated to the instructor, they could not be submitted within the established period, they may be submitted by the official date set for the final exam in the ordinary session, although in this case the instructor is not obliged to provide feedback on them.

Students have the right to take the final written exam even if they have not submitted the other assessable activities, but the final grade for the course will only be calculated if all activities have been submitted, according to the evaluation criteria and weightings established in this syllabus. If any assessable activity has not been submitted or completed, it will be recorded as ?Not Submitted? on the grade report for that session.

EXTRAORDINARY EXAM SESSION
The evaluation criteria are the same as in the ordinary session, meaning that all assessable activities required in the course must be submitted. Grades for completed activities (including the final written exam) will be retained until pending activities are completed. The same weighting criteria as in the ordinary assessment will apply. This measure applies only within the current academic year; if the extraordinary session is not passed, re-enrolment will require repeating the entire course.

USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) TOOLS
If AI tools are used in any activity, a paragraph must be included specifying how AI was used and what prompts or instructions were employed to obtain the results. Failure to do so constitutes a violation of academic honesty policies.

Evaluation Criteria
Basic Bibliography

Alonso, Luis Enrique, 1998, La mirada cualitativa en sociología: una aproximación interpretativa. Editorial Fundamentos. Madrid.
Batthyány, K. & Cabrera, M. (coord.) (2011). Metodología de investigación para las ciencias sociales. Apuntes para un curso inicial. Departamento de Publicaciones, Unidad de Comunicación de la Universidad de la República (UCUR).
Bericat, Eduardo, 1998, La integración de los métodos cuantitativo y cualitativo en la investigación social. Ariel. Barcelona.
Bertaux, D. 2005. Los relatos de vida. Barcelona: Bellaterra.
Botía Morillas, Carmen, 2013, ¿Cómo diseñar una investigación para el análisis de las relaciones de género. Aportaciones metodológicas¿, Papers, Revista de Sociología, 98 (3): 443-470.
Champagne, Patrick et alt., 1993, Iniciación a la práctica sociológica, Siglo XXI, México
Denman, C. y Haro, J. C. 2000. Por los Rincones. Antología de Métodos Cualitativos en la Investigación Social. México: El Colegio de Sonora.
Fernández Prados, J.S. 2018. Estrategias de Investigación en las Ciencias Sociales, Valencia, Tirant lo Blanch.
Flick, U.2., 2004. Introducción a la investigación cualitativa. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.
García Ferrando, M. 2015. El análisis de la realidad social. Métodos y técnicas de Investigación. Madrid: Alianza
Gorard, S. 2013. Thousand Oaks Research Design. Creating Robust Approaches for the Social Sciences. Sage.
Greenwood D. (2000). De la observación a la investigación-acción participativa: Una visión crítica de las prácticas antropológicas. Rev de Antropología social, 9:27-49
Hammersley, M. y Atkinson, P. (1994). Etnografía. Barcelona: Paidós
Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. Mc Graw-Hill: México.
Krueger, R. (1991). El grupo de discusión. Madrid: Editorial Pirámide.
Landeta, J. (1999). El método Delphi. Una técnica de previsión de futuro. Barcelona: Ariel.
Murillo S y Mena L. (2006). Detectives y camaleones: el grupo de discusión. Una propuesta para la investigación cualitativa. Madrid: Talasa.
Rubio, M.J. y Varas, J. (2004). (3ª ed). El análisis de la realidad, en la intervención social. Métodos y técnicas de investigación. Madrid: Editorial CCS.
Ruiz Olabuénaga JL.Aristegui I, y Melgosa L. (2002). Cómo elaborar un proyecto de investigación social. Bilbao. Universidad de Deusto.
Sanmartín, R. (2003). Observar, escuchar, comparar, escribir. Barcelona: Ariel.
Slafer, GA. (2009). ¿Cómo escribir un artículo científico? Revista de Investigación en Educación, nº 6, pp. 124-132.
Taylor, S.J. y Bogdan, R. (1992). Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. Barcelona: Paidós.
Ulin P, Robinson E.T., Tolley E.E. (2006). Investigación aplicada en salud pública.
Valles, M. (1997). Técnicas cualitativas de investigación social. Reflexiones metodológicas y práctica profesional. Madrid: Síntesis

Additional Material

For each topic, specific and up-to-date documentation and bibliography will be provided.