The working methodology for this course will be primarily practical, requiring active participation from students. Work will be done in two areas: collective and individual.
In the collective area: prior to each seminar topic (one topic per week), the professor will provide students with a set of materials and/or tasks that they must study or complete before the in-person class. In class, discussions will be based on the previously provided materials, or collective responses will be given to related questions. The professor will expand the boundaries of knowledge and reflection at optimal moments for student assimilation.
In the individual area, students will also write at least one essay on the topics presented during the course.
Finally, students will carry out a closing activity consisting of a group presentation on a topic of their choice related to the content worked on in class, bringing the interdisciplinary perspective offered throughout the course.
Regular assessment: To be evaluated in the regular call, all assessment activities must have been completed. Assessable activities must be submitted by the deadlines set by the professor. If, for a duly justified and communicated reason, the student was unable to submit on time, the activities may be submitted before the date of the course exam so the professor can grade them, although in this case, the professor is not obliged to provide feedback. Students have the right to take the final written exam even if they have not submitted all other assessment activities, but the final grade will only be calculated if all activities are submitted and according to the evaluation criteria and weighting established in this guide. If any assessment activity is missing, the student will be marked as ?Not presented? in the record for that call.
Extraordinary assessment: The evaluation criteria are the same as in the regular call, so all assessment activities from the course must be submitted. Grades for completed activities (including the final written exam) will be kept pending completion of any outstanding activities. The same weighting criteria as the regular evaluation will apply. This measure applies only to the current academic year, so failure in the extraordinary call will require repeating the entire course upon re-enrollment.
Participation: 25%
Participation in work groups: 50%
Individual work (essay): 25%
The necessary documents for each module of the course will be provided by the professor.
Sasia, P. (coord.), Etxeberría, X., Galo, B., Contreras, J., (2018) La perspectiva ética. Madrid. Tecnos.
Galo, B., Contreras, J., Sasia, P. (2023) La deliberación ética en la empresa. Madrid. Pirámide.
Aguado, R. & Eizaguirre, A., (coords.) (2020) Virtuous Cycles in Humanistic Management. From the Classroom to the Corporation. New York,
Springer.
Colomer, J y Beale, L. (2021) Democracia y globalización, ira, miedo y esperanza, Anagrama, Madrid