Degree in Philosophy, Politics and Economics

Bachelor in Philosophy, Politics and Economics

Get ready to face current challenges with a unique program taught by three prestigious universities

Regional and Urban Economics

Description
This course provides an overview of the main theories related to the field of regional and urban economics. It will address the relationship between geographic space and economic analysis, the processes and models of regional and urban specialization, regional economic policy, and spatial equity. It will also consider all aspects related to the role cities play in innovation and the role of the creative sector in the urban environment. The final objective of the course is to equip students with the main concepts and tools to analyze concrete and current problems in the regional and urban field.
Type Subject
Optativa
Semester
Annual
Credits
6.00
Previous Knowledge
Objectives
Contents

UNIT 0: INTRODUCTION
Topic 1: Presentation of the Regional and Urban Economics course
1.1. The importance of urban centers in the economy
1.2. Sustainable urban development
1.3. European cities. Urban environment assessment

UNIT 1
Topic 2: Principles of economics and urban planning
2.1. Principle of agglomeration or synergy
2.2. Principle of accessibility
2.3. Principle of spatial interaction
2.4. Principle of hierarchy
2.5. Principle of export

Topic 3: Perspectives on the city
3.1. The functions of the city
3.2. Globalization and city competitiveness
3.3. The knowledge city
3.4. Consumer city
3.5. City marketing
3.6. The creative and cultural city

UNIT 2
Topic 4: City and sustainability
4.1. Sustainable urban development
4.2. International commitments on sustainable cities

Topic 5: Sustainable urban policies in the European Union
5.1. URBACT
5.2. EU programmes and policies for sustainable city development
5.3. Transformative innovation ecosystems
5.4. Cross-cutting governance

UNIT 3
Topic 6: Development of study topics
1.1. Selection of specific themes/cities
1.2. Structuring of the project
1.3. Presentation and defense in class

Methodology

The working methodology is based on student participation in class, with a practical approach to the concepts explained. The course will begin with a conceptual part, followed by group work where students will analyze case studies, engage in reasoned debates to demonstrate acquired competencies, and develop a final course project.

Evaluation

Ordinary call: To be evaluated during the ordinary session, all required activities must be completed and submitted by the deadlines indicated by the teacher. If, for a justified and communicated reason, any activity cannot be submitted on time, it may be submitted before the exam date. However, the teacher is not obligated to provide feedback in such cases.
Students have the right to take the final written exam even if they have not submitted all the activities, but the final grade will only be calculated if all assignments have been submitted according to the established criteria. If any activity has not been submitted, the student will be marked as "Not presented."

Extraordinary call: The evaluation criteria are the same as for the ordinary call. Grades from completed activities (including the final exam) will be retained until pending tasks are completed. The same weighting criteria apply. This measure is valid only within the current academic year. If the extraordinary session is not passed, re-enrollment will require repeating the entire course.

Evaluation Criteria

Class attendance 10%
Participation in group work: 25%
Individual work: 30%
Final project: 35%

Basic Bibliography

Alonso, O. y Lucio, J. (1999): La Economía Urbana: Un Panorama. Revista de Economía Aplicada, Número 21,
(vol. VII), 1999, págs. 121 a 157.
Bairoch, P., (1988): Cities and Economic Development. From the Down of History to the Present, The University of
Chicago Press.
Brundtland, G.H. (1987): Our common Future Oxford, Oxford University Press. (Trad. en castellano, Nuestro
futuro común, Madrid, Alianza Ed., 1988)
Camagni, R. (2005): Economía Urbana. Barcelona: Antoni Bosch Editor.
Campbell, T. (2009): ?Learning cities: Knowledge, capacity and competitiveness?. Habitat International, 33 (2009)
195-201. Elsevier.
Council of Aalborg (2004): Compromisos de Aalborg. Cuarta conferencia europea de ciudades y pueblos
sostenibles, Aalborg (Dinamarca), 11 de junio de 2004.
Florida, R. (2003): ?Cities and the Creative Class?, City & Community, 2:1 March 2003.
Kotler, P; Haider, D. H. y Rein, I. (1993): Marketing Places. The Free Press.NewYork.
Krugman, P. (1995): Development, Geography and Economic Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Meijers, E., Hoekstra, J. y Aguado, R. (2008): ?Strategic planning for city networks: The emergence of a Basque
Global City?? International Planning Studies.August 2008.
Méndez, R. y Sánchez Moral, S. (2011): ?Spanish cities in the knowledge economy: theoretical debates and
empirical evidence?. European urban and regional studies, 18 (2): 136-155.
Porter, M. (1995): The competitive advantage of the inner city, Harvard business review, May/June, 57-71.

Additional Material

Boix, R. (2006): Barcelona ciudad del conocimiento: economía del conocimiento,tecnologías de la información y la
comunicación y nuevas estrategias urbanas. Ajuntament de Barcelona, Barcelona.
Boix, R. y Trullén, J. (2004): ?Knowledge, networks of cities and growth in regional urban systems: theory,
measurement and policy implications?. 44th European Congress of the European Regional Science Association.
Porto, 25-29 August 2004.
García-López, M.A. y Muñiz, I. (2007): ?¿Policentrismo o dispersión? Una aproximación desde la nueva economía
urbana?. Investigaciones regionales. 11 ? Páginas 25 a 43. Mayo de 2007.
García-López, M.A. y Muñiz, I. (2007): ?¿Policentrismo o dispersión? Una aproximación desde la nueva economía
urbana?. Investigaciones regionales. 11 ? Páginas 25 a 43. Mayo de 2007.
Green, F.J., Tracey, P. y Cowling, M. (2007): ?Recasting the City into City-Regions: Place Promotion,
Competitiveness Benchmarking and the Quest for Urban Supremacy?, Growth and Change, Vol. 38 No. 1 (March
2007), pp. 1?22.
Van Winden, W., van Berg, L y Pol, P. (2007): ?European Cities in the Knowledge Economy: Towards a Typology?.
Urban Studies, Vol 44, No. 3 525-549, March 2007.
Vegara, A. (2008): ?La planificación urbanística y sus implicaciones en el mundo en globalización?, UOC Papers,
ISSN 1885-1541, nº7, 2008.
Bertalanffy, L. (2014). Teori?a general de los sistemas: Fundamentos, desarrollo, aplicaciones (20.th ed.). Me?xico:
Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Castells, M. (1997). La era de la información: Economía, sociedad y cultura. vol. 2 el poder de la identidad. 441 2 1
Cic-Ucab/0392 20040218 Gr,
Gil, Z., Miguel Ángel. (2016). Un desarrollo territorial sustentable. Una propuesta desde el desarrollo humano y las
metodologías participativas. Revisión de los programas europeos Available from Universidad Complutense de
Madrid. (37966). Recuperado de: http://eprints.ucm.es/37966/
González, L. (1992). Teoría critica versus teoría de sistema: La confrontación habermas-luhmann. Realidad.
Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 41, 785-811.
Govers, R., & Go, F. (2016). Place branding: Glocal, virtual and physical identities, constructed, imagined and
experienced. Springer.
Herstein, R. (2012). Thin line between country, city, and region branding. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 18(2),
147-155.
Jiménez, M. I. M., & Mínguez, L. A. H. (2017). Cohesión y convergencia en la frontera de Castilla y León con
Portugal (1986-2016): Población, economía y territorio. In Anales de Geografía de la Universidad
Complutense (Vol. 37, No. 1, p. 183). Universidad Complutense de Madrid. doi:10.5209/AGUC.55962 Recuperado
de: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1899475291
Luhmann, N. (1982). Territorial borders as system boundaries. Cooperation and Conflict in Border Areas, 235-244.
Luhmann, N. (1998). Sistemas sociales: Lineamientos para una teoría general (Vol. 15). Anthropos Editorial.
Mascareño, A., & Büscher, C. (2011). Sociología del territorio. Revista LIDER, 19, 25-52. Recuperado de:
https://goo.gl/LL86kD
Midgley, G., & Wilby, J. (2015). Learning across boundaries: Exploring the variety of systems theory and
practice10.1002/sres.2357 Recuperado de:
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=109304471&l...
Petrova, M., & Nenko, A. (2018). Urban emptiness as a resource for sustainable urban development. Management
of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 29(3), 388-405. 10.1108/MEQ-01-2018-0004
Recuperado de: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/MEQ-01-2018-0004
Pressacco, F., Valenzuela, E., & Soto, G. (2017). Identidad regional y modelo de desarrollo alternativo: La
patagonia verde de aysén. Papel Político, 22(1), 159-182.
Rovaletti, M. L. (1989). Teoría general de los sistemas. Signo y Pensamiento, 45-56.
Scheel, M., Carlos. (2012). El enfoque sistémico de la innovación: Ventaja competitiva de las regiones. Estudios
Gerenciales, 28, 27-39. Recuperado de: https://goo.gl/44Lcib
Sen, A. (1998). Las teorías del desarrollo a principios del siglo XXI. Cuadernos de Economía (Santafé De Bogotá),
17(29), 73-100.
Urquieta, M. A., Mariñez, C., & Jorquera, C. (2017). Territorio como medium: Discusión sobre rendimientos
analíticos para las observaciones de la complejidad socio-espacial. Revista Mad, 2(37), 143-167.
10.5354/0718-0527.2017.47279 Recuperado de: https://revistamad.uchile.cl/index.php/RMAD/article/view/47279
Urteaga, E. (2010). La teoría de sistemas de Niklas Luhmann. Contrastes: Revista Internacional de Filosofía, (15),
301-317.
Vergara, N. (2012). "Significación social" y " territorio": Aproximaciones epistemológicas. Líder: Revista Labor
Interdisciplinaria de Desarrollo Regional, (21), 9-18.
Villatoro, F. (2017). El territorio como sistema complejo. Estudios Centroamericanos (ECA), 72(749), 165-176