Titular Professors
Professors
In order to register for the Final Master Thesis it is required to have coursed or to be enrolled simultaneously in all subjects that make up the title (taking into account enrollment restrictions that may apply).
The final dissertation requires prior knowledge of all subjects of the master, being most important the ones in which the work will make a focus of study.
Learning outcomes of the final dissertation are as follows:
1. Being able to cope with the realization of a project in the field of telecommunications individually.
2. Knowing how to analyze a specific problem in the field of telecommunications, and knowing how to propose solutions.
3. Strengthen the knowledge acquired over the subjects studied in the Masters.
4. Know and apply a methodology in its development.
5. Apply acquired techniques and knowledge with other materials.
6. Acquire skills for presentation and public defense of the final dissertation.
The content of the course will depend on the area of study chosen for the final dissertation.
The training activities that the student must follow to make the final dissertation can be divided into the following categories:
1. Working seminars with tutor teacher.
2. Study and personal work
3. Communication activities
4. Evaluation activities
In the final dissertation, assessment is carried out by a court which bases its rating on the basis of the given memory, the defense held and, where appropriate, practical demonstration. The defense of the final dissertation is a public event.
The evaluation criteria takes into account aspects such as:
- Organization and structure of memory both in form and in content (abstract, summary, Index, Body, Results, Conclusions and future trends, bibliography).
- Quality and correction of writing.
- Relevance of the proposed work and its justification.
- Presentation of TFM. Setting the time of presentation, which is 30 minutes.
-Synthesis capacity.
- Theoretical presentation. Theoretical knowledge of the subject matter of TFM: formalisms and development.
- Clarity of presentation.
- Clarity of oral presentation.
- Answers to questions from the court.
- Practical presentation.
- Show the environment in which it has developed.
- Quality results shown.
More specifically the evaluation criteria is based on four pillars:
- The assessment of the tutor Professor: weighted on the autonomy and solving, and planning and compliance objectives.
- The evaluation of the tribunal about the content of the work done: evaluate the content of the work, its novelty and results.
- Memory work: allow capacity assessment of written communication and search of information.
- Oral presentation: allow the assessment of oral communication skills.