Degree in Architecture Studies

In La Salle you will be trained to become a responsable architect. Likewise, you will acquire the capacity to respond to the needs of society using the most advanced knowledge and technologies

Research seminar

Description
Over the last decades, there has been a significant evolution in the objectives of urban planning, which has focused more explicitly on the needs and aspirations of the modern citizen. This transformation has led to a paradigm shift, giving rise to a deeper assessment of the place as a socio-physical space, highlighting its identity and its history. In addition, contemporary architects and urban planners have shown a growing interest in the relational aspects of space, such as sustainability in its social, economic and environmental aspects, inclusivity, community resilience and the various forms of appropriation of the 'space. These components have become fundamental in contemporary urban planning and design. In a similar way, regarding the characteristics of the architectural object, there has been increasing interest in those that facilitate its adaptation to the expectations, uses and desires of the user compared to others that come from a more aesthetic and/or technical approach to architecture. The flexibility, the adaptability of the spaces, their ability to promote social relations, as well as the haptic qualities of the building, its honesty and constructive economy are values that are increasingly welcome in contemporary architectural design. In this context, the main objective of this course is to contribute to the repositioning of architecture and urban planning professionals, in response to this paradigm shift, as well as to the redefinition of their objectives and work methods, using as in practical cases the cities of Barcelona or other localities in the metropolitan area. For this, a diversity of practices will be developed, such as the design and implementation of participatory methods in architecture and urban planning (in collaboration with housing cooperatives), the analysis of the inhabited space using interdisciplinary methodologies, the creation of places (placemaking), the design of tactical urbanism, etc., all of which agree to foster the links between people and the spaces where they live and find ways to increase the meaning belonging to the inhabitants, as a key value in contemporary architecture and urban planning
Type Subject
Optativa
Semester
First
Credits
3.00

Titular Professors

Previous Knowledge

SDR, Architectural Analysis and Project Fundamentals. Sufficient knowledge of spoken and written English

Objectives

The Learning Outcomes of this subject are:
RA.01 Expansion and specialization of knowledge that can influence the quality of architectural and urban design
RA.02 Ability to understand the responsibility of the architect with respect to the basic principles of the right to the city and sustainability (social, economic, environmental) in the production processes of the contemporary (urban, architectural) habitat
RA.03 Ability to develop architectural and urban planning programs considering the requirements of the users, developing the needs programs in close collaboration with them.
RA.04 Ability to analyze the precedents and location conditions that must be taken into account in projects, on an architectural and urban scale.
RA.05 Ability to analyze urban projects morphologically, socially, psychosocially, culturally and historically. Classify and characterize them.
RA.06 Ability to represent and communicate ideas using digital media in an intercultural and participative work environment.

Contents

The topics that are addressed in the work sessions address the various factors that affect the contemporary urban and architectural project:
 
- Existential: the relationship between building, inhabiting and thinking, according to Martin Heidegger
- Domestic: definition of the basic activities that are carried out in the domestic space; the objects and functions that characterize the domestic space; the difference between privacy and privacy (José Luis Pardo); inhabit spaces without function (Georges Perec)
- Anthropological: the dissolution of social and family structures and their impact on the ways of living; loss of collective identity: the liquid individual in liquid society (Zygmunt Bauman); a "liquid" home for a `liquid 'society.
- Social: immigration and multiculturalism as determinants of the forms of housing and the city; intergenerational cohabitation in shared domestic spaces; participation of the inhabitants in the design processes of the domestic space (Habraken, Kroll, Friedman); the sense of belonging to the place (Alison / Peter Smithson) legislation and regulations as descriptions of the consensus models of the way of living.
- Architectural: design of neutral spaces, flexible, versatile, versatile; autonomy of the rooms; self-sufficient buildings energetically; types of housing; the link between the architectural program and contemporary social needs.
- Technological: industrialization in housing construction; open systems; mass customization; efficient housing vs. Effective housing.
- Economic: housing as a commodity (commodity); minimum housing, micropisos; Housing models determined by economic criteria: value of land, available space.
- Urban: models of diffuse and compact city; sustainable communities, self-sufficient neighborhoods; integration of various scales and functions in urban renewal projects.

Methodology

Face-to-face work sessions take place weekly, in 3-hour sessions. In addition, the students develop the exercises outside of school hours. In the work sessions, teachers and students present the topics of reflection that give rise to a debate in the class. In these sessions, the students present the work done between sessions, which are commented on and discussed among all the seminar participants.
The methodology adopted is constructivist, in the sense that knowledge is built together between teachers and students, based on the materials provided in the classes, and the knowledge that is discovered during the exercises (learning by doing).

With regard to the case study, an active teaching and learning methodology focused on the realization of projects is applied. This methodology helps students to develop strategies and skills necessary for the realization of the urban and architectural project. In this way, they learn and develop skills similar to those that will be used in the professional field.
The pedagogical model is based on blended learning, a learning model that combines face-to-face activities with work done in the virtual space facilitated by the Arclass platform. The works are developed in the form of sequences, which are linked to each other, and students and professors from the participating institutions in the program participate in the design and implementation.
The students present the exercises in class, and in the computer environment. In this way, they can develop their communication skills, combining personal expression with computerized media

Evaluation

The evaluation of the results is carried out jointly by teachers and students (self-evaluation, peer-evaluation) using a rubric that describes the learning results for each of the tasks carried out.

Evaluation Criteria

Depending on the different tasks, the following criteria will be assessed:
1. Simultaneously consider the multiple factors that affect the contemporary architectural and urban project: anthropological, social, cultural, historical, psychosocial, technological, and economic.
It is assessed in the analysis and classification of precedents, in the case studies documented in the course repository.
2. Develop the ability to critically assess the precedents of urban projects, paying attention simultaneously to their technological, social and economic characteristics.
The student's ability to make their own judgment based on the sources analyzed in the analysis of precedents is assessed.
3. Develop the ability to critically assess the integration of the different spatial dimensions in the architectural and urban project: domestic, social, community, psychosocial, cultural, etc.
It is assessed in the reflections carried out by the student himself around the case studies, as well as in the comments and evaluations of the housing projects carried out by other students, from other institutions.
4. Know how to integrate into the project the knowledge provided by the future residents, and to design strategies that allow their participation in the process of giving shape to living.
It is valued in the activities specifically designed to promote dialogue and the participation of the inhabitants: work meetings, communication strategies, design of methods and strategies that favor participation.
5. Acquire a broad base of multidisciplinary knowledge where they can continue to develop in other subjects of the higher courses, particularly in those of projects, urban planning and composition.
It is valued in the activities carried out in the joint workshops, where urban and architectural projects are carried out.
6. Develop the capacity for expression and communication by combining media considered traditional (drawing, models, photography, video) with computers.
The ability to synthesize ideas and communicate them effectively to professionals and non-professionals is valued in the works presented on the virtual campus.
7. Develop the ability to learn and work independently.
The appropriate use of bibliographic sources, their originality and the ability to assess their relevance and pertinence to the topic under investigation is assessed.
8. Develop the ability to work creatively in collaboration, using information technology to work remotely and in teams.
The use of various digital media is valued, to carry out a collective work process, from the formulation of a problem to the presentation of the results.
9. Get to express and communicate ideas and projects, effectively, through the use of information technologies.

The use of digital techniques) as well as graphic composition, drawing and modeling programs is valued, to adequately represent the analysis of a case study and the development of an architectural and/or urban project.

Basic Bibliography

Ábalos, I. The Good Life. A Guided Visit to the Houses of Modernity. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, Barcelona, 2001
Alexander, C. A pattern language: town, buildings, construction. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977
Arc en rêve (editor) New forms of collective housing in Europe. Basel: Birkhäuser, 2009.
Bauman, Z. Identity: conversations with Benedetto Vecchi. Cambridge, Malden : Polity Press, 2004
Bauman, Z. Liquid modernity. Malden: Polity, 2000
Blundell Jones, P., Petrescu, D., Till, J. (editors) Architecture and participation.London: Spon Press, 2005
Bosma, K. Housing for the millions: John Habraken and the SAR 1960-2000. Rotterdam: NAI Publishers, 2000
Brophy, V., Owen, J. L. A Green Vitruvius. Principles and Practice of Sustainable Architectural Design. Earthscan, James & James, 1999
Costa, X. (editor) Housing and public space. Barcelona: Fundació Mies van der Rohe, Actar, 2010
Edwards, B. Rough guide to sustainability. London : RIBA Enterprises, 2005
Eleb M. L´invention de l´habitation moderne. Paris 1880-1914. Paris: Hazan, 1995
Fernández Per A., Mozas J., Arpa J. DBook- Density, Data, Diagrams, Dwellings. Anàlisis visual de 64 proyectos de vivienda colectiva. Vitoria: A+t ediciones, 2007
Fernandez Per, A., Arpa J. Next - Collective housing in progress. Vitoria: A+t ediciones, 2010
Ferrater C. Casas y habitantes. Barcelona: Actar, 2008
Förster,W. Housing in the 20th and 21st centuries / Wohnen im 20. und 21. Jahrhundert. München, Berlin, London, New York: Prestel, 2006
French H. New Urban Housing. Laurence King, 2006
Gausa M. Open:espacio tiempo información; arquitectura, vivienda y ciudad contemporánea: teoría e historia de un cambio. Barcelona: Actar, 2010
Gausa M., Salazar J. Housing & Singular Housing. Barcelona: Actar, 2001
Gili Galfeti G. Pisos piloto: células domésticas experimentales = Model apartments : experimental domestic cells. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 1997
Habraken, N. J. Variations : the systematic design of supports. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1976
Heiddeger, M. `Construir, habitar, pensar´. En Conferencias y artículos, traducción de Eustaqui Barjau. Barcelona: Ediciones del Serbal, 1994
Kendall, S., Teicher, J. Residential open building. E & FN Spon, 2000
Kieran, S., Timberlake, S. Refabricating architecture. New York: MacGraw Hill, 2004
Kroll, L. An architecture of complexity. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1986
Lacaton, A., Druot, J.P., Vasal, F. Plus: la vivienda colectiva. Territorios de excepción. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 2007
Lapuerta, J. M. Manual de Vivienda Colectiva. Barcelona: Actar, 2007
Lleó, B. Sueño de habitar. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili,1998
McCamant, K., Durrett, C. CoHousing: a contemporary approach to housing ourselves. Berkeley: Ten Speed Press, 1994
Montaner, J. M., Muixí Z. Habitar el presente: vivienda en España : sociedad, ciudad, tecnología y recursos. Madrid: Ministerio de la Vivienda, 2006
Monteys X., Fuertes P. Casa collage, un ensayo sobre la arquitectura de la casa. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 2001
Moore Ch., Allen G., Lyndon D. The place of houses. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1974
Moya, L. Vivienda reducida. Madrid: Mairea, 2007
Pardo, J. L. La intimidad. Valencia: Pretextos, 1996
Perec, G. Espèces d´espaces, Édition Galilée, París, 1974
Rapoport, A. House, form and culture. Englewood Cliffs : Prentice-Hall, 1969
Schittich, C. Cost-effective building. Economic concept and constructions. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag, 2007
Schneider T., Hill J. Flexible Housing. Oxford: Architectural Press, 2007

Additional Material